Why tolerance is the #1 cost driver
Most prototype quotes we receive specify tighter tolerances than the part actually needs. The instinct makes sense — tighter = safer, right? Wrong. Cost grows non-linearly: ±0.1 mm is standard mill output, ±0.025 mm doubles the cost, ±0.01 mm requires grinding or careful CNC and quadruples cost, and anything tighter than that lives in lapping/EDM/jig-grinder territory at 8-15× standard.
The economics are simple: tighter tolerance = slower spindle speeds, more passes, in-process gauging, climate-controlled inspection, more rejected parts, more setup time. Every step multiplies. Yet most parts have one or two features that need precision, and twenty that don't.
How to actually choose tolerances
Map every feature to a function. Bearing bores? H7. Mating slip fits? H8. Cosmetic edge? ISO 2768-m (±0.1-0.3 mm). Threaded hole position? ±0.1 mm. Press-fit? Compute from the actual interference you need. Most general dimensions can simply default to ISO 2768 medium class and free up your supplier to use standard tooling.
Apply tolerance only where it solves a real problem — a fit, a function, a regulatory requirement. The rest defaults loose. We've seen customers cut $40 unit costs to $8 just by relaxing the "default" tolerance from ±0.025 to ±0.1 and tagging only the 3 critical features.
What we recommend in practice
Default ISO 2768-m on every drawing. Then call out specific features with explicit numbers — H7 bearing bore Ø25.0 +0.021/0.000, slip-fit shaft Ø24.95 ±0.01, threaded boss true position 0.1 mm. This is exactly how aerospace prime-tier suppliers spec their parts. It works for them, and at our scale it is what makes the difference between a $25,000 prototype run and a $4,000 one.
Have a part in mind?
Send us your CAD — quote with detailed pricing and DFM feedback within 4 working hours. No forms, no signup.
From the blog
6061 vs 7075 aluminum: when paying 3× for 7075 actually pays back
7075-T6 has 80% higher yield than 6061-T6 and costs 3× more. Here is the practical decision tree we walk customers throu...
Anodize Type II or Type III? A finish guide for engineers
Type II is for color, Type III is for wear. The hard part is knowing which trade-offs you are making with each....
Where your $80,000 injection mold actually goes — a cost breakdown
Steel cost. Machining hours. Polish hours. Inserts. Trial shots. Where every dollar of mold tooling goes, with real shop...
Upload a CAD file. Get an engineering-reviewed quote in under 24 hours.
No minimum quantity. Free DFM feedback from a senior manufacturing engineer. NDA signed before file review on request.
Working on a live project? Send the STEP file and the two or three features you are unsure about — an engineer replies with DFM notes and a price, usually within four working hours.