ISO 9001:2015ITAR RegisteredRoHS · REACHLead time from 3 business daysMOQ = 1 part
PifyC
Services
Materials
Industries
Applications
Resources
Locations
Company
Request a quote
5-axis CNC milling drawing: Al 7075-T6 block with pockets, toolpath and dimensions
PEEK vs Ultem

Both high-temperature. Very different uses. Cost matters.

PEEK and Ultem (polyetherimide) are both high-performance engineering plastics for aerospace, medical, and demanding electrical applications. PEEK is stronger, higher-temperature, more expensive. Ultem is transparent, cheaper, lower performance. Here's the decision guide.

Process comparisonsWuxi, ChinaMOQ 1 partDFM review included

Side-by-side summary.

PEEK (Polyetheretherketone)

Highest-performance thermoplastic. 260 °C continuous service, excellent chemical resistance, biocompatible medical grades. The premium choice for demanding applications.

Ultem (Polyetherimide, PEI)

High-performance polyetherimide. 170 °C continuous service, inherently flame-retardant UL 94 V-0, transparent amber color, lower cost than PEEK. Good middle-ground high-temperature plastic.

Feature-by-feature breakdown.

AttributePEEKUltem (PEI)
Continuous service temp260 °C170 °C
Peak temp (short)315 °C200 °C
Tensile strength96 MPa110 MPa
Flexural modulus4.0 GPa3.4 GPa
TransparencyOpaque (natural)Transparent amber
Flame retardantUL 94 V-0UL 94 V-0
Chemical resistanceExcellent (approaches PTFE)Moderate
BiocompatibilityUSP VI, ISO 10993 (medical grades)USP VI
Implantable medicalPEEK-OPTIMA availableNot typical
MachinabilityGoodGood
Cost (per kg)$120–180 unfilled, $300+ medical$50–90 unfilled
SterilizationAutoclave, gamma, ETOAutoclave, gamma, ETO
Density1.32 g/cc1.27 g/cc
FDA food contactFDA 21 CFR 177.2415FDA 21 CFR 177.1595

When to choose each.

Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) when:

Choose Ultem (Polyetherimide, PEI) when:

Get an instant quote

Send your CAD — we reply with detailed pricing, lead time, and DFM feedback within 4 working hours.

Talk to an engineer

WhatsApp our team directly. Most messages answered within 12 minutes during work hours.

Explore all services

CNC, 3D printing, injection molding, sheet metal, casting, finishing — one quality system, one partner.

Working on a live project? Send the STEP file and the two or three features you are unsure about — an engineer replies with DFM notes and a price, usually within four working hours.

FAQ

Both high-temperature — questions

Which is more chemically resistant?

PEEK — significantly. PEEK resists essentially all common solvents, acids, and bases at moderate temperatures. Approaches PTFE in chemical inertness while retaining mechanical strength. Ultem has moderate chemical resistance — attacked by many common solvents (acetone, DMSO, DMF) and prolonged exposure to strong alkalis. For chemical processing applications, PEEK is the default. For electronics and medical where chemical exposure is limited, Ultem is often adequate.

Cost difference?

Substantial. PEEK unfilled: $120–180/kg billet. Ultem unfilled: $50–90/kg. PEEK medical-grade (Invibio PEEK-OPTIMA): $300–400+/kg. Ultem 2300 medical: $80–120/kg. For equivalent part, PEEK version typically 2–3× cost of Ultem. Justify PEEK premium only when application genuinely requires its superior temperature or chemical performance.

Why is PEEK opaque and Ultem transparent?

PEEK is semi-crystalline — polymer chains pack into crystalline regions that scatter light, producing opaque appearance. Ultem is amorphous (chains randomly oriented) — no crystalline regions to scatter light, so inherently transparent amber. This crystallinity difference also explains why PEEK has higher temperature performance (crystalline regions don't soften until higher temperature) and better chemical resistance (crystals less permeable).

Medical implants — PEEK always?

Almost always, yes. Invibio PEEK-OPTIMA is the standard implantable polymer for spine cages, orthopedic hardware, dental abutments. ISO 10993 compliant, FDA 510(k) cleared implant-grade materials available. Ultem is USP Class VI biocompatible but rarely used for permanent implants — PEEK's superior long-term biostability wins. For surgical instruments (non-implantable), Ultem works fine and is much cheaper.

Machining differences?

Both machine similarly to mid-difficulty engineering plastics. PEEK has higher glass transition (143 °C) so cuts cooler without softening — slightly forgiving for feeds/speeds. Ultem (Tg 217 °C) is also quite machining-stable. Both benefit from: sharp tools, moderate cutting speeds (150–200 m/min), light air or water coolant, periodic chip evacuation. Glass-filled variants of both are harder on tools (PCD tooling preferred).

Which for 3D printing?

Both available via FDM with appropriate high-temperature printers (Stratasys Fortus, Roboze ARGO). PEEK printing requires specialized machines (chamber temperature 160+ °C, bed 200 °C, nozzle 400+ °C). Ultem more accessible — prints on machines with 140 °C chamber. For prototypes, FDM Ultem is common; FDM PEEK requires specialist service. SLS/MJF of PEEK and Ultem emerging but not mature. For CNC-machined parts in these materials, we offer both.

5-axis CNC milling drawing: Al 7075-T6 block with pockets, toolpath and dimensions

Send a CAD file. Get an engineering-reviewed quote.

No minimum quantity, free DFM feedback from a senior manufacturing engineer, and an NDA signed before file review on request.